Identity Online
Identity Online
Create a blog entry that
introduces two
frameworks for considering identity. Then, use one of these frameworks to
compare a major pop musician’s public social media presence on two of the
following platforms: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok.
Include screenshots to illustrate your ideas about the identities they are
constructing for their audiences.
Identity online can be considered
in multiple ways but is predominantly described as a set of resources which
people refer to and it is important to say that it is not a singular identity,
but it is multiple identities. Identity online is who you want to be but also how
you want others to perceive you and how other people do perceive you.’ (Barton
and Lee). This concept provides an understanding of self-representation online.
In this essay, two frameworks for considering identity will be discussed. Social
Identity Theory and Self Categorization Theory. Social Identity theory was developed
by social psychologists Henri Tajfel and John Turner in 1979. (Hogg M, 2016). Tajfel
believed that social identity was “an individual’s knowledge that he belongs to
certain social groups together with some emotion and value significance to him
of this group membership”. (Tajfel, 1972, p. 292). The
self categorization theory was created by Turner and colleagues after Tajfel’s death
in 1982 and consists of three levels of self-categorization that are important
to the self-concept. The superordinate category of the self as human being (or
human identity), the intermediate of the self as a member of a social ingroup as
defined against the other groups of humans (social identity) and the
subordinate level of personal self-categorizations based on interpersonal
comparisons (personal identity). (Hornsey M, 2008). In
this essay, the self-categorization theory will be used to compare Taylor Swift’s
social media presence on Twitter and Instagram.
Taylor Swift is highly known for
connecting with her fans through her music and online presence. Taylor has created
many social identities on the platforms she uses. Her use of Twitter and Instagram
provides an interesting comparison of how she uses self-categorization theory
to create different social identities on each platform.
For example, on Twitter she has a
loyal fanbase where she currently has 92.7 million followers, and she uses the platform
to share updates on her music, personal life and social causes she supports. She
frequently uses hashtags and retweets to connect with her fans and promote her
music.
Her most recent post on Twitter is promoting her music which is the
same for Instagram with the same picture and caption however a difference to
this on Twitter is that it has 28.4k comments however on Instagram her comments
are off which is unusual as she interacts with her fans a lot on Twitter by
retweeting posts and commenting. Perhaps because she does this on Twitter, she
does not want to do it on Instagram as well.
Additionally, on Twitter, as stated before, she uses it to express her social stances and causes she supports.
For instance, after the horrific mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas,
Taylor expressed her anger and grief about the matter on Twitter, but she did
not do that on Instagram, in my opinion this is because Instagram is used more for
the social aspect and Twitter could be used for a more political aspect. Taylor
is expressing a negative stance on the subject here because of her use of emotional
nouns, ‘grief and rage’. This is because she is expressing her support for
Texas and as seen below a commenter replies with gratitude that Taylor, who is
a huge celebrity and can have lots of influence on many things, shows her
support for a community in heartbreak..png)
In contrast to this, Taylor shares pictures of her friends on Instagram
whereas on Twitter she does this slightly less, but it is not significantly
less to be a solid argument.
In conclusion, Taylor Swift’s use of the self-categorization theory
on her social platforms provides a colourful insight into how celebrities can
create and modify their social identities based on context and situational factors.
By using different social media platforms Taylor can showcase different aspects
of her life and connect with her fans on a deeper level and because of this she
has built a strong loyal fanbase. Finally, her support for social and political
causes has helped her to create inclusive social categories who may feel excluded
in other social groups.
Bibliography
Barton D, Lee C. 2013. Language Online: Investigating digital texts and Practices. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon. Routledge.
Hogg M. 2016. Social Identity Theory. In: McKeown S, Haji R, Ferguson N. (eds). Understanding Peace and Conflict through Social Identity Theory. [No place]. Springer.
Hornsey M. 2008. Social Identity Theory and Self Categorization Theory: A Historical Review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Volume 2, Issue 1. pp. 204-222. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x
Tajfel, H. 1972. Social categorization. English manuscript of ‘La catégorisation sociale’. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la psychologie sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272–302). Paris: Larousse.
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment